Mousumi Akter | প্রকাশিত: ২৯ জুন, ২০২৬, ০৪:৩১ এএম
The 2009 interview between Oprah Winfrey and Whitney Houston was intended to mark the singer's triumphant return to the spotlight. More than fifteen years later, it has become the center of a contentious debate about what truly happened backstage.
The controversy was ignited when Oprah Winfrey recently spoke at the Cannes Lions festival, recounting the day Houston appeared on her talk show to promote her final studio album, "I Look to You." Winfrey suggested that the singer had relapsed and was under the influence, resulting in a fall from the stage .
Winfrey stated that she felt compelled to protect Houston at the time, recalling how she "begged" the studio audience not to share images of the incident, fearing it would have "destroyed" the star's career .
This recollection, however, has been met with immediate and forceful denial from Houston's inner circle and estate. Pat Houston, who manages the late singer's estate, has firmly rejected Winfrey’s account, asserting that while Houston did indeed fall, it was due to environmental factors rather than intoxication. The estate attributed the mishap to a dark stage area and Houston's unfamiliarity with the set layout during a soundcheck, emphasizing that she was "absolutely not high" at the time .
Adding to the chorus of dissent, those who were physically present on the day of the taping have come forward. Whitney Houston’s former hairstylist, Tiffanie Dixon, who says she was standing nearby, described Winfrey's suggestion as a lie, stating that the fall occurred because the stage had not been properly roped off .
Furthermore, a source familiar with the production described Houston's demeanor that day as "upbeat and happy," contradicting the narrative of impairment . Veteran entertainment journalist Roger Friedman has also questioned the veracity of Winfrey’s latest statements, recalling a 2021 Zoom meeting where Winfrey reportedly acknowledged that drugs were not the cause of the fall .
While defenders of Oprah Winfrey argue that her comments are merely an honest recounting of the past and a reflection on the challenges of celebrity, critics view the disclosure as a breach of trust. As the debate intensifies, the conflicting accounts have sparked a broader public conversation about historical accuracy, loyalty, and the legacy of an icon who is no longer here to speak for herself .